“Called a guy today about a house he has for rent. Turns out he’s only renting the upper half (for more than what the market will pay, I think, considering I’ve seen it advertised for awhile). Since we really don’t want to rent half a house and live in fear about who lives in the basement (and share laundry), we asked why he doesn’t just rent the whole house. He said he can’t, it wouldn’t cover his mortgage – he’ll get more to rent it out as two suites. These new landlords are hilarious, thinking that rent will cover their mortgage!
By running the numbers, it looks to me like he put $400k down (he told us how much his mortgage payment is). I also think it’s a failed flip – I’ve been watching it awhile and when I googled the address two weeks ago, it was for sale and there was an open house that weekend, though another google search tells me the Vancouver sun featured it in their real estate section as being bought in December 2012. This guy must be panicking….
I think our time has come, bears! Anyway, it’s a nice house, maybe we’ll be able to buy it for $400k one day (lol).”
– pricedoutfornow at VCI 26th May 2013 12:50pm
Most Recent Comments:
- CaptainCalamari on Vancouver RE – ‘Heaven’ At A ‘Perfect Price’
- kabloona on Canadians Owe More Than $1.5 Trillion; Up 7.4% From 2013
- Bambi on “Forget The Eights, Let’s Just Sell The Place.”
- Marco Bitran on Gord Goble in Local Newspapers – Vancouver RE ‘House Of Cards’ Will “Implode”
- 3rdRock on Canadians Owe More Than $1.5 Trillion; Up 7.4% From 2013
- Whipmaster~Kerthwhack on Hoocoodanode?
- Whipmaster~Kerthwhack! on Hoocoodanode?
- Whipmaster~Kerthwhack! on Hoocoodanode?
- Whipmaster~Kerthwhack! on Hoocoodanode?
- Whipmaster~Kerthwhack on Canadians Owe More Than $1.5 Trillion; Up 7.4% From 2013
- 3rdRock on Canadians Owe More Than $1.5 Trillion; Up 7.4% From 2013
- BlaMmO on Canadians Owe More Than $1.5 Trillion; Up 7.4% From 2013
Type of Anecdote
- 01. He Said, She Said (248)
- 02. Profiting from the Boom (446)
- 03. Changed my Life (106)
- 04. Changed my Career (39)
- 05. Where do Buyers get the money? (990)
- 06. Held my Nose and Leapt (97)
- 07. Avoiding Vancouver (377)
- 08. Overextended Buyers (1,197)
- 09. Delaying Buying (316)
- 10. Demoralized Renters? (367)
- 11. Regrets about Investing in RE (417)
- 12. Effects of Development (276)
- 13. 2010 Olympics Related (74)
- 14. Social Effects of the Boom (1,262)
- 15. Misallocation of Resources (964)
- 16. Missed The Boat? (236)
- 17. The Froogle Scott Chronicles (27)
- 18. Spot The Speculator (171)
- 19. BlastRadiusPostCards (17)
- 20. The Limitless Demand Argument For Ongoing Market Strength (70)
- 21. Vancouver RE-Verse [Found Poems] (8)
- 22. RE References In Popular Culture (44)
- 23. Jumping The Shark (1)
- 24. Policies On Housing (11)
- 25. Epigrams For The Bubble (1)
- 26. Premature Calls Of "Bottom" (3)
- 27. Seller Panic (3)
- 28. Erroneous Causation Theories For Falling Prices (7)
- 29. Bubblespeak (1)
- Uncategorized (177)
Blogroll
- 01 Vancouver Condo Info
- 02 AmericaCanada [retired, no archive]
- 03 Housing Analysis
- 04 RealEstateTalks BC
- 05 Vancouver RE and then some
- 06 Whispers from the Village on the Edge of the Rainforest
- 07 Greater Fool
- 08 Canada Bubble
- 09 Rob Chipman's blog
- 10 YatterMatters
- 11 condohype [retired; archives available]
- 12 vancouver (un)real estate
- 13 Agent Will's Stats [retired]
- 14 Landlord Rescue
- 15 The Economic Analyst
- 16 Canadian Housing Price Charts
- 17 Hoodsurf [retired Jun 2011]
- 18 World Housing Bubble
- 19 Vancouver Price Drop
- 20 North American Economics
-
Latest Anecdotes:
- Canadians Owe More Than $1.5 Trillion; Up 7.4% From 2013
- Vancouver RE – ‘Heaven’ At A ‘Perfect Price’
- G&M – “Canada’s housing bubble about to burst, author says”
- Bank Of Canada Induced ‘Havoc’, Plus Bits & Pieces
- In Case You Thought Our Bubble Was Due To Special Local Factors…
- Interest Rates Held Far Lower Than Necessary Cause Speculative Bubbles
- ‘A decade ago 40% of all purchasers in the States were first-timers. Today is it 27%. In Canada the number exceeds 50%, and is rising.’
- ‘Canada’s moment as an economic standout is over.’
- ‘The Extra Breadwinner In The Family’ – ‘Does your house make more than you?’
- ‘Extreme Speculation’ – “The problem is that the diversion of resources into investments that are only justified by the stream of new money and artificially low interest rates will destroy wealth at the same time as it is boosting activity.”
- “It won’t last. It just prepares the way for the bust. It forces out real businesses. And it drives out people who find themselves financially unable to live here any longer.”
- ‘Vancouver Affordable Housing Agency’ Created By The City
- Enter Inflation, Stage Right
- Average House Price In Canada Rose 7.1% YOY
- Vancouver School Trustees Threaten Risk Of Property Price Drops In Debate Concerning Rights Of Transgender High School Student
- House Painting
- Wage To House Price Ratio Is A Changin’
- No, Not Karl Marx; That Other Mark, Mark Carney – “Just as any revolution eats its children, unchecked market fundamentalism can devour the social capital essential for the long-term dynamism of capitalism itself.”
- The New Yorker – Vancouver RE As A ‘Hedge'; “Zombie Neighbourhoods”; “The rest of us better get used to being tenants”
- “On my block, there are three empty million-dollar houses. Property values are skyrocketing. It is a disaster for people who want to live in Vancouver.” – Charles Hou, retired social studies teacher
- Vancouverites have ten times the personal debt of people in the ‘debt capital of Britain’.
- ‘How badly would you be hurt in a housing market price correction?’ [The Globe and Mail]
- A Veterinarian’s Dilemma – “Living in a 300-square-foot closet, moving to northern B.C. or renting for life.”
- Vanc RE, No change – “..really mildish weather that’s very livable..”
- “No problemo. 69 per cent of the condo tower is pretty stable.”
- Still Dead
- BC Premier: “I think the market’s good, it’s a buyers market. I want to make sure I get in before prices start to rise.”
- “You’ll have to pry my cell-phone from my cold, dead hand….” [Off-topic, but irresistible]
- Mayor Robertson Selling His House
- “Nothing Wrong Here!”
- “We spoke to a friend of ours yesterday. Even though she has purchased a house, she wants to keep (and rent out) the condo she’s living in, because she thinks prices will only go up.”
- Families With Children Leave Vancouver – “We bought a townhouse in Port Moody in 2006, sold it in 2011 and bought a house. We couldn’t have done that in Vancouver. Absolutely not.”
- The Economist on Land Taxes – “Taxes on immovable property are the most growth-friendly of all major taxes.”
- “It’s kinda funny that 3 unrelated Irish blokes all said that this mess in Vancouver/Canada RE is unfolding EXACTLY like the mess did in Ireland, one headline at a time.”
- “I was really fortunate with how things worked out for me in real estate. I definitely took chances when I bought a few presale condos to flip back in 2004, but I was adamant at the time that there was room to grow for Vancouver.”
- Making Sense Of It All
- “I have been contacted by two of my realtor friends in the past week both proclaiming that the market is turning and that this is a good time to buy.”
- Trump on Vancouver – “Your people, they go to New York, they go all over the world, and they speak so highly.”
- ‘Canadians obsessed with real estate, poll suggests’ – “Just as many people reported talking about real estate on a regular basis as they did about hockey.”
- ‘Doomed’? – “Home prices in Canada are now double what they were in the 1970s in real terms. Historically, over the very long term, real home prices tend to be flat.”
Follow vreaa on twitter
- Canadians Owe More Than $1.5 Trillion; Up 7.4% From 2013 wp.me/pcq1o-5Al 2 months ago
VREAArchives
- December 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- December 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- October 2008
- September 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
Tags
affordability Alberta Anecdotes Asia Audio anecdote Australia Bailout Banks Bears blogs British Columbia Bubble Bulls buyers Canada Capitulation Caveat Children China CMHC Construction Crime Debt Densification Developers Dreams Earthquake Economy Edmonton Employment Fear Foreclosure Foreign buyers FTBs Fundamentals Government Housing Incomes Interest Rates Ireland Landlords Life Market_Timing Media Mortgage brokers Okanagan Olympics ontario opinion Ottawa Ownership Prediction Rain Real Estate Realtors Relationships Renos Rent Retirement RE_ATM Seattle sellers Sentiment Speculators Stories Tax Technical Analysis Toronto UBC UK US Vancouver Victoria Visual Anecdote Whistler
Rent not covering the mortgage…never mind cost of capital, taxes, maintenance etc. Screwed.
Of course, he’d get more money if he rents it out as two suites.
But he’d also get twice the headaches.
i was talking with a guy who told me he just invested $10 000 in a financial product. he said its the riskiest thing hes ever done with him money. he recently bought a house in north van for 1 million. he asked me what i thought of his risky investent of 10k. i said……the riskiest investment that you have mad was buying your house in north van. for 1 million dollars 8 months ago. he looked at me like i was crazy. people really have no clue.
Demonstration of the denial of the death of the “single family dwelling”.
pffft! … http://tinyurl.com/q5v8yts
I confess I am just not getting the whole Accordian thing, sorry….
BTW, I would never rent “half-a-house”…..might end up with the Ford Brothers selling hash outta the basement suite. Not good….
I confess I don’t understand this anecdote. None of it really makes any sense to me and I am not in the mood to try and parse the guys writing style or logic.
http://vancouver.en.craigslist.ca/van/roo/3807868132.html
I dont even know….
That appears to be a jail cell….
Wow I wonder where the toilet is?
http://www.vancitybuzz.com/2013/05/vancouver-rentals-a-bed-in-the-bathroom-why-not/
CL post is gone but lives on here.
We’re all aware of the mortgage-vs-rent ratio’s in Canada being so famously high (eg http://www.economist.com/news/finance-and-economics/21569396-our-latest-round-up-shows-many-housing-markets-are-still-dumps-home). Yet, in Van at least, I keep seeing rents that are clearly trying to cover a big chunk of their mortgage. Trying to cover your mortgage on a huge house with an illegal basement suite seems to be the Vancouver way.
Housing booming – rents go up. Housing crashes – rents go up (like in the US after 2008). Renters get screwed no matter what.
I doubt the US renter who didn’t buy in 2006 and bought in 2011 would agree he got “screwed”.
I’m talking about renting, not buying.
I was renting in the US at the time. Rents were already very high – higher than most mortgages of my friends and colleagues (and I had a below average rent). When the housing crash came, rents shot up dramatically. This was from an increase in the number of renters due to people who had been foreclosed on now renting or people who normally would have bought waiting for the bottom before buying.
The housing market is picking up where I was, rents have not gone back down. The people I know that rent say they’re still climbing.
So, like I said, housing booms – rents go up. Housing crashes – rents go up.
Yes, it’s worth consideration when calculating investment returns.
“Trying to cover your mortgage on a huge house with an illegal basement suite seems to be the Vancouver way.”
Why I tell people from Seattle or Portland what it’s like in the city just to the north of them, they just shake their heads.
W Tucker,
If you just use Craigslist, you won’t go very far.
The best deals are gone the minute they’re posted.
Gotta be more creative than that.
Example: truly beautiful $850k assessed home for rent for $1,200. Stayed up on CL for days. Reduced to $800 and disappeared within minutes. Comox Valley of course, not Vancouver.
That doesn’t sound like an 850K house to me. If all it can command is $850/month rent, only in bizarro world is it worth 850K.
AleX,
This is what happens in a market build on speculation rather than on fundamentals.
Everything goes.
I rent a house in Richmond, assessed at 1.2 mill for 1.5 k a month.
Gotta do your homework.
That’s a pretty damn good deal by Lower Mainland standards. Well done.
UBC,
Well it helps that we are a professional family with good references.
Also, I’m doing all the yardwork.
We just renewed for another year. The landlord actually offered us a four year lease for $ 1,550 a month, but we opted for a year only, because we believe the RE market will have softened substantially by spring next year. And then we probably will buy again.
Don’t get too excited bears. Friends just sold their place in Kits. 70 viewings in a single weekend with something like 12 offers, several without conditions and they sold for $1.2m and $25k OVER ask.
Buyer had no financing condition – Gen Y with help from parents. Maybe….Rennie…..is…..right. Gulp.
Receding,
More details please.
Address, MLS listing, parental contribution, etc.
Once you supply us with the details, we can get our fact checker on the case.
I just did a quick check of Realty Link for Kits. It looks like $1.2M is still entry level for a Kits SFH. So your friends’ house might qualify as ‘the cheapest house on a good street/in a good neighbourhood’, which is supposedly an astute purchase. And $25K over is only 2% over asking, which suggests that if there were 12 offers, most were at asking, or even under asking. Half-decent houses in desirable locations, or well-priced houses (relative to the current market) in desirable locations, will still sell. Houses are still selling in Grandview-Woodlands, parts of which are like Kits East these days. Back in the worst of the bidding wars days, say 2006, this same house might have sold for $100K or $150K over asking. Assuming the bubble is going to deflate, it won’t deflate uniformly in all areas, nor will it deflate uniformly over time.
OR “Receding Gains” is lying. Plain and simple
Maybe it’s old-fashioned, but the little voice in the back of my head says that, whether financed through banks, parents, or self, the return on capital is the same. At some point a little kid is going to raise her hand and ask the simple question nobody really thought to ask.
Nice — BTW what was the assessed, 1.5M?
I don’t want to share the details because these are friends and I want to respect their privacy. But this all happened in May. They live in heart of Kits. Their place was a semi-detached house with small garden area – and very very nice (the owners are successful professionals and decorate however they want etc. – the place shows well). Happily they’re the sort of people who buy because they like the place and are not speculators gambling or leveraging their way up.
There seems to be a little momentum in this market and buyers are returning. But if it were going to happen then this is the month for it. My gut feeling is that the market will fall off a cliff in October….but I’ve been saying that for a while.
The weird thing I observe is that there are similar places all over Cambie corridor area starting at $1.1m and Cambie is crap compared to Kits (I’m not referring to the higher density zoning spots on Cambie, I’m talking about places off Cambie outside the rezoning areas). Cambie Street itself is like a (gridlocked) highway despite the Canada Line opening, and the area simply doesn’t feel relaxing (if that makes any sense). Kits is waaaaaay nicer yet the two areas are priced at about the same level. It seems that Cambie was simply a flavour-of-the-year in 2011 for speculators and prices haven’t returned to earth yet. Cambie will collapse before most areas….probably sooner than everyone expects.
Please speak for yourself, I personally find the exact opposite of Cambie vs Kits and much prefer Cambie….
My friend bought a place March 2012, 1 block east of the Cambie Corridor. He paid $1.5 mil for an 80 yo 2,000 sqft bungalow that needed $150k in renovations to get it barely livable. A couple of months back there were exact replicas, move-in-ready, of his house a couple blocks away selling for $1.2 mil. That would be a decrease of about 25%. When I brought this up with him, he chuffed, “But look at MLS, there is only one house on the Cambie Corridor for under $1.5 mil.” I checked, he is right, seems that all the supply was bought in the frenzy. Frightening.
Any deflation of the bubble is likely to be an erratic affair: down, up, sideways, down again, but with an overall trajectory of down. Vancouver’s previous two bubbles took five years to deflate. The price escalation of the previous decade has been so massive, that you’d think there would have to be one or more periods of precipitous drops, but even that scenario doesn’t rule out bounces, brief periods of momentum, etc.
The thing that really leaps out at me here, however, is $1.2M for a half duplex! I’d assumed an entry-level SFH. Okay, it’s nice. It had better be for that price. And it’s in one of Vancouver’s most in-demand residential neighbourhoods. But does Vancouver’s economy, or do the incomes of enough Vancouverites, support $1.2M duplexes into perpetuity? I suspect they don’t.
The economy doesn’t support it, but the money from elsewhere does. As long as this is the best place on earth, the money will keep coming here and prices will remain unaffordable. This run has lasted about 13 years already.