SimeonG [Simeon Garratt, head of Asian business development at Key Marketing Group] at VREAA 7 Jun 2011 at 11:43am –
“As I’ve been quite involved in this whole process of driving asian buyers (primarily Mainland Chinese) to purchase property in Vancouver I know quite a lot about the headspace about overseas investors/buyers. In majority, they aren’t buying in Vancouver for fun. They truly want to live/work/retire here. That creates a much different ‘bubble’ than one formed around pure investment.
Nobody wants to admit that this ‘demand’ can’t stay strong forever and that pricing can’t stay this inflated without an obvious ‘bust’ at some point in the future. However, no one really wants to fully explain why it can’t. When you look at it from the flipside and see the sheer demand that exists in China at the RE expos and see how long the lineups are at the immigration consultancies.. it does start to make a bit more sense.
I do like getting the opinions of people looking at this industry from the outside.”
When you are in dense undergrowth, it can be hard to gain perspective regarding the lay of the land.
Industry insiders in SimeonG’s position are almost definitely sincere in their beliefs that demand for Vancouver RE is limitless. They have experienced first-hand the line-ups, the agitated & eager buyers, the breathless bidding wars. And, they see folks buying units every day. Those are all powerful pieces of information.
During a speculative mania, demand always seems overwhelming.
But demand is actually elastic, and can snap down to nothing, or actually become supply, in very short order.
We believe that this will occur once prices turn. It may take restrictions on loose lending or rising rates to precipitate such a turn, but neither is necessary. All that it will take is for prices to stall, and for speculators to begin to attempt to realize their thus-far-paper gains, or to attempt to protect themselves from losses. Demand will evaporate and supply soar.
Simeon asks for ‘outside’ perpective, and our advice (and request) to him would be to gather some information. We’d suggest that he sit down with his next ten buyers, regardless of origin, and, if he has the temerity, ask them the following questions –
1. Would you be purchasing this property if you knew there was a considerable chance of future price decreases?
2. What magnitude of price decrease do you think are possible in this market?
3. How would you respond if prices dropped 10%? or 20%? or 30%?
We suspect that the answers that Simeon got from these buyers would give him some ‘outside’ perspective.
We’d guess a good percentage, perhaps the majority, would tellingly begin by saying: “We don’t expect price drops”. If so, ask them what they’d do if they did indeed start occurring.
Another group would intellectually acknowledge that a small fluctuation in prices may occur (say 5% or even 10%). Ask them how they’d respond if prices dropped 25%.
A much, much smaller percentage would answer: “So what? I like the view.. and the shops.. and the schools.. drops in prices are irrelevant.”
The responses to these questions would tell you how ‘real’ the demand is.
People who want to actually use the accommodation, to live in it, or rent it out for income, wouldn’t be at all deterred by the idea of price drops; they’d stay put, they’d hold their purchase.
Furthermore, investors who genuinely think these properties are well priced by global standards would be looking to buy more if prices drop. They’d say: “Please contact me with buying opportunities if that occurs.”
But speculators (momentum ‘investors’, gamblers) who have bought on the premise of relentless price rises will be looking to be out of the deal if prices are heading down.
What is motivating current buyers?
Answers to the questions above could tell us.
Of course, the chances of Simeon, or any other real estate salespeople, actually putting those questions to prospective buyers is close to nil. Why? Because he already instinctively knows that even the thought of possible price drops deters buyers. He already knows that, in this market, the vast majority are buying anticipating ongoing price appreciation.
Simeon: Perhaps you can find a palatable way of exploring these thoughts with some of your clients. We’d appreciate it greatly if you could share their responses with us. The exercise may confirm what you already suspect; or it may give you some ‘outside’ perspective. We’d be interested either way.
– vreaa
































So this guy drives the foreign investors who make up 1% of the market?
Vancouver home prices poised for correction, could fall 21 per cent: report
By Sunny Freeman, The Canadian Press
SSSSSSSSSSHHHHHHHHHH!!! Don’t tell Rusty.
TORONTO – Homes in Vancouver have become so expensive you might have to win the lottery to afford one, says a prominent economist — and with prices that sky-high, odds are the city is ripe for a big drop.
Overpriced homes in some Canadian cities, along with elevated household debt, suggest the real estate market is vulnerable to a correction — especially in Vancouver, senior economist Sal Guatieri said in a Bank of Montreal report released Tuesday.
“Riding a wave of wealthy immigrants, Vancouver’s house prices have nearly tripled in the past decade, spiralling beyond the reach of most first-time buyers or non-lottery winners,” Guatieri said.
Homes in that Pacific Coast city now cost 11.2 times median family incomes — a ratio that measures the median home price to median annual household disposable income. That’s more than double the current Canadian average of 5.1 times income.
Chinese demand for houses in Vancouver has been strong, on the back of looser travel restrictions, as well as stricter buying rules and lofty prices in China. A recent survey by Demographia rated Vancouver the third least affordable city in the world, behind Hong Kong and Sydney, two other cities influenced by Chinese demand, he said.
“While land-use restrictions and high quality-of-life rankings can justify elevated prices, current steep valuations could prove unsustainable if foreign investment ebbs or interest rates climb,” Guatieri said.
Past housing corrections have seen Vancouver home values fall an average of 21 per cent. But prices in the city are even higher today, averaging $815,000 in April, pushing the market further toward the brink of a housing bubble.
However, if interest rates stay low and foreign investment continues, the price correction could stabilize sooner than in the past, Guatieri said.
Even excluding Vancouver, average home prices have more than doubled in the past 10 years to a historically high level.
“Due to ultra-low interest rates, affordability isn’t a major issue yet, with first-time buyers allocating about one-third of their disposable income for mortgage payments, as is the norm,” Guatieri said.
“But high valuations suggest that even a moderate increase in interest rates will slow the market in coming years.”
Some triggers that could set off a broader collapse include a rapid rise in interest rates, a sharp increase in unemployment or a slowing of foreign investment.
High home prices in Toronto also mean the country’s biggest city is likely poised for softer prices in the near term, fuelled by a rising supply of condos that could soon outstrip demand, leaving a glut on the market.
Housing costs in the city eat up 6.7 times family income, comparable to costs in the late 1980s before prices slid 25 per cent. However, mortgage rates now are under four per cent, compared to 14 per cent in the earlier decade.
“That said, while high valuations might be sustainable in an ultra-low rate climate, they could come under pressure in a more normal rate environment,” Guatieri said.
Meanwhile, the report said energy-rich Calgary could see home prices rise in coming years. It is one of the few Canadian cities, along with Edmonton, where prices have not returned to pre-recession peaks, reflecting the fallout of overbuilding during the oil boom before the financial crisis hit.
http://ca.finance.yahoo.com/news/Vancouver-home-prices-poised-capress-3105641674.html?x=0
with this information in hand, rusty is planning his helicopter tour of calgary
Vreaa,
Would it be possible to know what a “healthy” price-to-rent ratio is?
This property is for sale for $549,000 and the exact same unit above has recently been rented (last month) for $1,800 a month.
http://www.realtor.ca/propertyDetails.aspx?propertyId=10654077&PidKey=-1103701903
If my calculation is correct, the ratio for this apartment is 25.41. I guess this is insane, but I can’t figure out how insane it is…
EM
For me, if the rent was at least $3200 on that property, I would consider it as an investment. Or if the price was around $300k, assuming that I could realistically rent it out for $1800/m.
Condo fees and taxes may change the numbers a bit.
is there a city in Canada where a 549K valued property will rent for as much as 3200.00?
just rent it out the basement to four working holiday exchange students
seen it done
“is there a city in Canada where a 549K valued property will rent for as much as 3200.00?”
You tell me. There are properties in my target area with equivalent or better rental yield. Nowhere near Vancouver though.
High-end houses in Waterloo go for $500k-600k, and rent for $2500-2800/mo.
El Magnifico ->
In the US they use annual.rent:price ratios; here in Canada monthly.rent:price ratios.
The condo you link has a ratio of 305:1.
Strictly speaking one should subtract condo fees etc from the rent before you find the ‘net’ rent for the calculation. Likely costs of at least $250 p.m., right?, so a real ratio more like $549K:$1,550 or 350:1.
Most investors are interested in properties with ratios in the 150 range.
This is another way of saying that, using the rental income as a fundamental measure of value, this condo is more than 50% overpriced.
el: i believe that is considered a poor ratio – isn’t new york lower??
i wanted to mention, vreaa:
perhaps what you really should say to Simeon is to suggest he ask these questions of buyers (that are not HIS clients)
he would get the same answers without negatively affecting his own interests.
Good idea:
Simeon; how about that?
That can be done
hey I just had an employee from the Census of Canada come to my building, he was inquiring as to how many vacant units were in the building. Never had that happen before, maybe something to do with that investigation into foreign ownership?
For some reason, I don’t think someone with a name like “Simeon Garratt” is going to get the straight goods on what motivates his firm’s Mainland Chinese clients to want to move to Canada. The Chinese buyers might not want to share that info with a lowly chauffeur or they might suspect he’s a government immigration agent.
Simeon Garratt is not in a position to suss out what really motivates Mainland Chinese buyers and even if he was, they probably would bother telling him.
Quickie SemioticsLesson, PP – “Simeon Garrat” is either a sauve PracticalJoke pseudonym, as in MonkeyChokehold (loosely translated from homonyms SimianGarrote) or a stupendous Cinematic&Architectural ‘FilmNoire’ allusion to the ‘detailing’ at RandolphHearst’s ‘shack’ (as in Garrets @ SanSimeon Castle – “Rosebud… Rosebud?”; youTube “CitizenKane”).
PS – will use your “MysticalShibboleths…” with attribution in upcoming PostCards when it’s, “InTheCan.”
Or:
http://ca.linkedin.com/in/simeongarratt
Ok… if you must insist on ‘Reality’, you PernicketyEditor, You!….
Then, in riposte, I offer you the motto of Simeon’s AlmaMater…
“”A Mighty Fortress is our God!”
http://tinyurl.com/3k8njjz
Rather apt for a Realtor™, “Non?”…
&Here’sTheWrylie:
[Avec une fanfare … Il poissons pour une cigarette … Lights il. Écrase le paquet de Gauloises maintenant vide. Saveurs la lie de Chardonnay et de…]
Nemesis:
Touché!
CheekyAfterthought:
http://tinyurl.com/yzqdcjc
met a girl who told me she had a philosophy degree from TRU
i lol’d, too
not tru, twu LOL x2
MonkeyChokehold… Very clever… but it looks like he’s legit. Simeon might speak the right lingo, but he’s got the wrong look.
BTW, “Il poissons pour une cigarette” is a litteral translation of “He fishes for a cigarette”… It should be translated as “Il cherche pour une cigarette.”
So I’m a monkey chokehold, I have the ‘wrong look’ and I’m a chauffeur?
What does my name have to do with Asian buyers not giving me the straight goods? I’m not a chauffeur and no longer do I work for The Key – given they had the complete wrong approach to Asian marketing – and am now on my own.
I would say that I’m in a pretty good position to ‘suss out’ the true motivators. I lived in China for 15 years, speak Mandarin and Cantonese have MANY friends and colleagues from China that have gone through the motions and immigrated + bought houses here in Vancouver.. unless all those are moot because of the origins of my name.
I agree there is a ‘bubble’ but in reality.. where isn’t there? Hong Kong has been doing it for the past 20 years.
I will ask the questions listed above in the next little while and will let you know the responses.
I posted an interesting article in another thread about longer term perspectives in real estate pricing… It was published in the NY Times on March 5th, 2006, about 1 year before the US RE market SHTF… Robert Shiller was very bearish about prices, whereas other “experts” didn’t share his bearishness… Please note comments about “superstar” cities:
“Not everyone agrees with Shiller’s irrational-exuberance thesis. “I just don’t see it that way,” said Richard Peach, a vice president at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and an author of a study in 2005 that concluded that the sharp rise in home prices is in line with economic conditions — that it indicates not a skewed vision of reality but a strong economy. In fact, Peach says, in the past 20 years family buying power has grown faster than housing prices. “We sometimes wonder why home prices haven’t increased much more, given the tremendous increase in the size of mortgage the average family can finance,” he said.
Like-minded experts include Christopher Mayer of Columbia University and Joseph Gyourko and Todd Sinai of the Wharton School, who focus on what they call “superstar cities,” places so desirable that they not only are not headed for a correction but they also can sustain “ever-increasing” prices compared with less-sought-after cities.”
“places so desirable that they not only are not headed for a correction but they also can sustain ‘ever-increasing’ prices compared with less-sought-after cities.”
So far, Vancouver is the only one 😉 Move over New York.
those questions are all one sided from a bearish viewpoint, like you know exactly the market is gonna to crash. if you are that good, you should have owned many properties by now. These predictions have been around since VHB and other bearblogs.
Your 3 questions are like asking a pedestrian before he crosses the street:
if you know you are gonna be hit by a car, would you cross the street?
how many broken ribs do you think you are gonna have?
duh!
Once the bubble crashes, I would love to see the reaction of all the chinese that bought a house from this guy…
http://www.globalnews.ca/video/index.html?releasePID=s1TDc5JNkPpCy8pfSqI87RYo3uZyim7m
He’d better look his back…
Isn’t Cam Good the biggest douchebag ever? I hope he ends up bankrupt like Harry Stinson in Toronto.
again, WHY DOES NO ONE SPEAK ABOUT CHINESE CAPITAL FLIGHT LIMIT LAWS?? MMMM??
the laws don’t apply to party members? please explain, cam.
Oh it goes much deeper than that. Flight laws are like drug charges in BC.
Makaya -> Thanks for that link; will headline.
@anonymous
full house in Kitchener for 1650.00/month near the Univesity. I don’t think Waterloo full house would rent anywhere close to 2800.00/mo – unless it’s a mansion. Perhaps you can provide an example.
Here is mine:
http://kitchener.en.craigslist.ca/apa/2374936557.html