“While the national housing market appears to be retreating in an orderly way, the data show pockets of sharper slowdown, particularly in the western Canadian cities of Vancouver and Victoria, which once led the hot housing market.
“Personally I don’t see any revitalization of the market in the near future,” said Victoria real estate agent Tony Joe, noting that investors have left the market.
Residential sales fell 8.3% in September from a year earlier in Victoria and were down 32.5% in Vancouver, according to the local real estate boards. Prices were down 2.6% in Victoria and 1.4% in Vancouver on the year, according to the Teranet report.
The price declines are far smaller than the plunge that hit U.S. homeowners during the crash. Still, buyers are hesitant, wondering if they should wait until next year to purchase.
“Sellers will commonly say, ‘I’m going to wait until the spring, when the market is better.’ And I warn them that it could be worse,” said Joe. “And of course buyers are saying ’It looks like things are bad, I’m going to hold off until the market drops another 10 or 20%.”’
Joe, a 21-year industry veteran, does not foresee such a drastic decline, simply because Canadian lenders have been prudent and interest rates are not going up soon. Sellers will pull houses off the market rather than accept a price drop.”
- from ‘Canada braces as housing slowdown takes hold’, National Post, 5 Nov 2012
Most Recent Comments:
- hcg drops on Gord Goble in Local Newspapers – Vancouver RE ‘House Of Cards’ Will “Implode”
- china il on British Columbians Selling & Moving To The US – “It was just too good of an opportunity to turn down.”
- tfcu oklahoma on British Columbians Selling & Moving To The US – “It was just too good of an opportunity to turn down.”
- Real Estate Tsunami on Chat Thread
- 604x on Chat Thread
- Monserrate on David Dodge – “Look mister borrower, you’ve gotta have an equity stake in this as well… so that if things go really bad, it’s not all on the Canadian taxpayer, part of it is on you.”
- 604x on Chat Thread
- 604x on Chat Thread
- Nemesis on Chat Thread
- neonatal nurse Jobs on ‘Giant Bubble Bursts Into The Record Books – “Screams of excitement followed gasps of astonishment as a giant bubble rose up and surrounded the participants before bursting in spectacular fashion.”
- What And When To Purchase Langley Real Estate Langley Real Estate Agents Can Be Busy Because Of The Completely New Building Around The City! | Bookworm Room on Author Of ‘Real Estate Investing for Canadians for Dummies’ “jumped into the market 3 years ago with a 2 BR apartment in Mount Pleasant”; Reports Ownership Cheaper Than Renting; Leaves Out Math
- rod_jonsson on Chat Thread
Type of Anecdote
- 01. He Said, She Said (247)
- 02. Profiting from the Boom (441)
- 03. Changed my Life (103)
- 04. Changed my Career (38)
- 05. Where do Buyers get the money? (958)
- 06. Held my Nose and Leapt (96)
- 07. Avoiding Vancouver (375)
- 08. Overextended Buyers (1182)
- 09. Delaying Buying (315)
- 10. Demoralized Renters? (362)
- 11. Regrets about Investing in RE (417)
- 12. Effects of Development (274)
- 13. 2010 Olympics Related (74)
- 14. Social Effects of the Boom (1255)
- 15. Misallocation of Resources (958)
- 16. Missed The Boat? (236)
- 17. The Froogle Scott Chronicles (27)
- 18. Spot The Speculator (171)
- 19. BlastRadiusPostCards (17)
- 20. The Limitless Demand Argument For Ongoing Market Strength (70)
- 21. Vancouver RE-Verse [Found Poems] (8)
- 22. RE References In Popular Culture (41)
- 23. Jumping The Shark (1)
- 24. Policies On Housing (10)
- 25. Epigrams For The Bubble (1)
- 26. Premature Calls Of "Bottom" (3)
- 27. Seller Panic (3)
- 28. Erroneous Causation Theories For Falling Prices (7)
- 29. Bubblespeak (1)
- Uncategorized (176)
Blogroll
- 01 Vancouver Condo Info
- 02 AmericaCanada [retired, no archive]
- 03 Housing Analysis
- 04 RealEstateTalks BC
- 05 Vancouver RE and then some
- 06 Whispers from the Village on the Edge of the Rainforest
- 07 Greater Fool
- 08 Canada Bubble
- 09 Rob Chipman's blog
- 10 YatterMatters
- 11 condohype [retired; archives available]
- 12 vancouver (un)real estate
- 13 Agent Will's Stats [retired]
- 14 Landlord Rescue
- 15 The Economic Analyst
- 16 Canadian Housing Price Charts
- 17 Hoodsurf [retired Jun 2011]
- 18 World Housing Bubble
- 19 Vancouver Price Drop
- 20 North American Economics


-
Latest Anecdotes:
- Chat Thread
- Taking A Break
- “My best guess: this property is now an ‘investment hold’ and will be built ‘when prices recover’. Good luck on that!”
- Man Loses $745,000 Vancouver Condo Deposit
- Graphic – Degrees of Housing Overvaluation in Canada
- The Rare Individual With A Negative Ownership Premium
- Advice Regarding Renting In Vancouver, Please – “Unfortunately, the Vancouver rental stock is absolutely atrocious. It just seems like every landlord is looking for someone to pay 100% of their mortgage on a crappy place through rental income.”
- “I just visited Manhattan for a week, and happened to snap some real estate ads on both the Upper West and Upper East sides of the island. Compare to Vancouver. It simply doesn’t compute.”
- Ben Rabidoux In Vancouver Next Week
- “The mortgage company told me they were calling in my 40-year, 0-down mortgage. I have paid nearly sixty thousand dollars towards it, but, nearly five years in, I have yet to touch the principal.”
- ‘Vancouver City Hall: Housing Report Card 2012′; Plus Revised Version
- “My folks find themselves at 65 still owing half the value of their home and recreation property to the bank. After almost 30 years of ownership in the BPOE and a number of boom markets, they have very little to show for it.”
- “Rent for $2,200 a month or buy and have a mortgage of $4,310 per month. Why would anyone buy?”
- “They were talking about two couples they knew who had recently bought a lot and planned to each build a house on it and live as neighbours.”
- Greater Vancouver Home Builders’ Association Annual First-Time Buyer Seminar Attendance Plummets
- Mom and Pop Get It Wrong In All Markets, Time And Again
- The average British Columbian homeowner is not going to pay off their mortgage by the time they retire.
- “He’s sold all his properties except his current one, which is now for sale. He explained that the market’s currently in crash mode, worst that he’s ever seen.”
- “One of my old high school buddies finally got her mother to sell the family home in Kitsilano – sold for over $1M, monies realized after debt paid off $185K.”
- “I know someone who just declared bankruptcy because her condo was assessed at $150k and she bought it presale north of $250k in 2005 or 2006.”
- Sturdy, With Views – “Calling Froogle Scott!… Is Dr. Scott ‘In The House’?” [Not In This One, Certainly]
- “She said the market was dead in Victoria and that it would remain so for a very long time. I asked how she knew. Her answer was fascinating and should scare the pants off the real estate crowd.”
- Kits Notes – “I’m pretty sure that this is the first 3+ bedroom property of any type that I’ve seen in the 5 years I’ve lived here that is priced below $700K.”
- “A beautiful Belfast home, in the equivalent of 1st Shaughnessy, bought at their RE peak in 2007 for £3.5 million, has now sold for £800K, almost 80%-off. The market didn’t suffer any significant economic shocks. Rates & unemployment didn’t skyrocket. They didn’t build more land. Sentiment just changed and the prices fell and fell.”
- “Two family members of hers are trapped, underwater, in condos on the East Side.”
- “Interprovincial migration is not saying good things about BC’s economy.”
- Vancouver RE: Not As Expensive Provided You Don’t Think – “It’s clear that our perception of affordability has been coloured by living on a continent where housing is unusually inexpensive.”
- More Undisclosed RE Industry Insiders Publicized As Clients – “In 1995, Allan and Karin Hoegg were mortgage-free. But no more. Today their Vancouver home is a valuable source of income as they plan for full retirement.”
- Rumor that some OV units will be reduced by 20%.
- Downside Weights On The Vancouver RE Market – “One of the older guys (over 60) mention to the guy beside him that he and his wife were thinking about selling their family home, and renting, in order to get some of the money that was locked up in the house.”
- “My buddy was looking to upgrade to a house in the Coquitlam area. With 200k extra for a home, that’s half of lifetime saving between him and his wife.”
- “I was walking in the Fraser neighborhood yesterday, I noticed that the population, on average, seem to be composed of workers. I belong to the top 5 percent in terms of income. Nevertheless, I cannot afford any of the houses for sale in that neighbourhood.”
- “Vancouver is an urban resort whose value mostly resides in its real estate and not much else.”
- “Rogers Communications is expanding into RE; aiming to relaunch website; providing critical data that can help potential buyers assess the value of a property from the comfort of their home computer.”
- I’m only 50 and I can just about retire if I want to, all because of a single simple decision – “When prices rebounded to their former highs, then rocketed another 30% higher to what I considered to be totally unsustainable levels, I decided that only a fool would pass up a second opportunity to harvest such a massive non-taxable capital gain, and in 2011 I sold my place.”
- The Vacant Lot of Versailles, Richmond.
- “I don’t think that most people think things are going to crash, just that there is going to be a slight correction, but it was amazing to me how sentiment has changed, and the fact Vancouver RE is too high was just understood.”
- “The ‘investor’ who purchased our house put it up for sale two months later, in January 1981, but the bubble had burst.”
- For A City To Have That Kind Of Vacancy, It’s Like Cancer – “Downtown, the vacant unit rate is so high that it’s as though there were 35 towers at 20 storeys apiece – all empty.”
- “What’s the worst that can happen? You can’t pay your mortgage, so sell your house! No fear.”

Follow vreaa on twitter
- Chat Thread wp.me/pcq1o-5vD 3 weeks ago

VREAArchives
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- October 2008
- September 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
Tags
Anecdotes Banks Bears blogs British Columbia Bubble Bulls buyers Canada Capitulation China CMHC Construction Debt Economy Employment Fear Foreign buyers Fundamentals Government Housing Interest Rates Landlords Life Media Mortgage brokers Okanagan Olympics Ownership Prediction Real Estate Realtors Relationships Rent Retirement RE_ATM sellers Sentiment Speculators Toronto US Vancouver Victoria Visual Anecdote Whistler




























I wonder if this guy wants lower prices only to increase the pool of buyers. I don’t have the heart to tell him it doesn’t work like that.
Yeah.
And anybody who expresses the belief that “Sellers will pull houses off the market rather than accept a price drop” is simply displaying their woeful ignorance of how markets work.
How real estate markets work. The normal textbook supply demand curve seems to suggest that lower prices will increase demand but in speculative bubbles, at least initially, the exact opposite occurs. Those who are sticking to their “lower prices will increase demand” argument aren’t checking their history.
Exactly.
Once the premise of rising prices is removed, speculative demand completely disappears.
And real demand only comes in a price levels vaguely in the vicinity of those supported by fundamentals; which, for Vancouver is a long way below.
If I hear about the prudence of Canadian banks one more time I’m going to scream. The banks are prudent, the borrowers are prudent, all the way up to 163% income-to-debt. But it’s prudent debt. Used to buy thing we really, really need. Like soap and toothpaste and milk.
Agreed. This mantra about prudent banks is very annoying and a lie, of course…
Its a convenient catch all meme that fills the inferiority complex most Canadians subconsciously retain while giving them permission to join the herd and override their usual pathological paralyzing fear of risk investment.
actually, the cdn banks are more prudent … in the sense their de facto bailout for bad lending decisions is pre-approved (via cmhc) and that they do not have exposure to things like 30 yr mtgs at current rates … cdn banks are in a much stronger position relative to homeowners
Like the US banks were, through Fannie Mae.
hmm … all the players in the cdn RE bubble had a great view of the us RE bubble and all the others ww – a great opportunity to watch and learn something … as it turns out, looks like the banking sector ‘got it right’, figured out how to get in on the game, then harvest more ‘profit’ and with lower risk to themselves … i think by extension one should have conclude the herd turns out to be nearly the dumbest on the planet … smarter banks + dumber(est) herd = biggest valuation bubble (presto!) … makes perfect sense
Harper & Flaherty knew exactly the type of inferiority complex they had to work with when they cynically enacted their fiscal policies that ignited the Canadian ponzi scheme of gluttony. With the commodity surge artificially inflating the currency they could inflate the paper wealth of the middle class and give them that wealth feeling that would would separate them from the “other” (renters, unionists, anyone who couldnt afford a new f350) and get their majority government.
bubbly – congress still had to approve financial bailouts after everything melted in ’08 … with cmhc the risk transfer is already done – if they drain their reserves, i understand taxpayer is already on the hook
That logic does not fly.
If I were to go on a spending spree and find out I cannot pay, and then go to my parents for a bailout, does that make me prudent?
Doesn’t matter what the congress had to do. Everyone in the banking industry assumed (correctly) that bailouts will happen.
@Bob – the pre-Harper governments are just as guilty. Prices started their rapid rise in 2002. Stupid policies that ultimately lead to it were enacted even before that.
bubbly – yes i think many assumed correctly the implicit guarantee for fnm bonds would hold if tested … eg. pimco famously bet heavy on this (and i owned a lot of pttrx) … but i still recall the scale and scope of the bailouts was very much in doubt and could have ended up being much smaller, forcing creditors to absorb bigger losses … my pt was just the situation for canada is more certain with less risk to financiers and more risk to public (4soc – this is how they are ‘more prudent’ … the scalp is taken … now who is already set up to bear most of the fallout?) … will be interesting to see how much real public resistance materializes when loss reserves are gone, to what extent can/will cmhc pursue underwriting fraud, etc. …
–
in the us, trending up … private equity is taking advantage of low rate environment to buy foreclosure property wholesale on the cheap … effectively, to rent back to all those people who lost their homes and savings in the bubble … nice huh? maybe an ‘improved’ version of that in the future up north
bob, funny you should mention the f350
a buddy worked at ford, said he couldn’t believe how many of these 60,000k trucks (harley davidson models specifically) flew off the lot to anyone who got approved, being a (late model) ford, most of them are lemons and back within a few years due to bad design/poor maintenance (apparently they don’t understand how often the oil has to be changed in a diesel)
Bob- yeah, I had to buy a Ranger rather than an F350. God Damn middleclassers!
@bubbly – during the Liberals reign there was an uptick in Kits housing. From 375k to 500k from 1999-2005. It was the sick and twisted 40 year / 5% down that ran them up from 500 to 2mm from 2006-2011
@UBC – A Ranger? you peasant. obviously destined for a job that pays 38k a year that will ensure you will never spend 75k on a kitchen reno nor will your invite to the royal order of water buffalo and political bribery be forthcoming
Bob, please stop campaigning and look at the actual data: http://vreaa.files.wordpress.com/2010/04/2010-mar-rebgv.jpg
Average detached price in 2002 – $400k
Average detached price in 2006 – $800k
Prices doubled in the 4 years between 2002 to 2006. It was an obvious bubble back then already. Conservatives only added fuel to a raging fire.
(PS: I am NOT a fan of Cons nor Libs or NDP)
talking about bank prudence.. i forsee a lot of helocs being wiped out in bankruptcy.. is this covered under chmc as well? are there any numbers on the banks exposure to helocs?
+1
it’s propaganda, nothing more – that we allow it to happen is the major failure of the CRTC and Canadians not writing more letters to the broadcasters for lying to us.
kind of like the OIL COMPANY commercials constantly blaring through the television after THE ECONOMIC ACTION PLAN commercials – if i see one more Oil Company PR rep swinging on a swingset watching a soccer game, i’m going to lose my shit.
Washington State Ballot Initiative 502 legalizing marijuana another nail in the coffin for the BC Ponzi real estate scheme.as triads, viets, bikers and east indian gangs have less drug profit to wash in BC economy and less drug profit to buy political influence in BC
Because the only buyers of BC marijuana were Washingtonians?
Also just because an initiative gets enough votes doesn’t mean that it will become law. There are thoughts the federal government has jurisdiction for outright legalization so if they do institute this law it wil (in my view)l be in legally sneaky ways like in California. Not that I know much about it.
“Not that I know much about it.”
-exactly, if this is the logic and research you used to play in RE. explains why the whole thing is in trouble
-Because the only buyers of BC marijuana were Washingtonians?
Are you being obtuse on purpose? I obviously did not say that, i said gangs will have LESS profit, not zero. As to business that the gangs do in Washington. I think we can assume with an estimated 4 billion $ a year generated for the bikers, east indians, triads and viets etc in BC from marijuana cultivation that some of that pot might be making its way across the 687km shared border with Washington State.
- be in legally sneaky ways like in California.
Not sure what lawbook you got this definition from. But in California it was made legal for medical marijuana sales by a state ballot. 1000 feet from school, licensed etc. The feds in the form of the DEA and Justice said from the get go before the vote they would not respect the state law. And they have and havent depending on the region and whoever the US attorney is and what bug is up their ass. Some busts, some shutdowns and in other places absolutely nothing and people with prescriptions purchase pot with no trouble.
-The Ballot initiatives that passed in Washington and Colorado last night went beyond medical marijuana and said do you want straight up Legalization for marijuana for persons 21 and older and at the same time make driving while stoned illegal. Both states said yes. Oregon had the same ballot and it failed. Washington will see I-502 called for a 25 percent excise tax at each stage from the growers on until it is sold in stores to adults 21 and over. They could buy up to an ounce of dried marijuana; one pound of marijuana-infused product in solid form, such as brownies; or 72 ounces of marijuana-infused liquids.
State financial experts estimate it could raise nearly $2 billion in tax revenue over the next five years, with the money going toward education, health care, substance abuse prevention and basic government services. and out of the hands of Canadian Organized Crime Syndicates.
- So there is no wait and see. It was voted by the people of the State. 400 million a year in much needed revenue and attendant lowering of policing and court costs will go a very long way for the state to tell the feds to take a long walk off a short pier.
rather prickish…
“Sellers will pull houses off the market rather than accept a price drop”
Sure they will, buddy. Unless of course, they have to sell due to health reasons, a job loss or move, a crushing mortgage that they can no longer afford or any other reason that won’t let them just pull that sucker off the market. Yes, a percentage of these people may try to rent their property out rather than taking the hit, but that’s just prolonging the agony.
As for a prudent bank, that’s about as common as an honest realtor.
You forgot to add the sleeping giant of forced sales. Divorce. As the HELOC $ runs out and flash cars and first class trips become less frequent watch the divorce rate skyrocket in the Lower Mainland. Another dire social consequence brought to you by short term greed.
The effect of HELOCs and the general exuberance of “I’m money poor, but house rich because it’ll always appreciate in market value,” has poisoned pretty much everything in the lower mainland. The Vancouver of the 1990s and early 200s was a very, very, different place than the Vancouver of today. Back then it felt like just a slightly more expensive, more rainy but warmer part of Canada. Now it doesn’t seem very Canadian at all.
An interesting phenomena seen in the US was a DROP in the divorce rate due to being financially unable to manage the separation! Must make for some frosty relationships, and him on the couch.
Great, so people in Vancouver will be even more unfriendly. Even more reason to leave.
I’m fascinated with marriage because it in some ways is a doppelgänger for real estate investment. What I mean is that people often go in to a contract with emotions usurping rational thought.
The dissolution rate is of particular interest because by the nature of these unions they cannot be forecast to fail in advance by the participants (but usually by the families LOL). Further there are few, if any, means available to hedge against dissolution.
There is a hedge against marriage default. Its called a pre-nup. But too many men fall for the “what, dont you love me honey” line and forgoe it. the other problem is when people get married when they are young and accumulate their assets during the marriage. Thats when it gets ugly. Working husband stay at home mom. She wants half.. hes like .. why did i work 50 hours a week 50 weeks a year for the last 20 to give that b*&^% half of everything…etc etc. Speaking from first hand experience as the child in this situation. Daddys hiding assets mommys hiring private investigators and the lawyers make out like bandits as emotion and revenge drag a divorce into three four five years
Jewelery is supposed to be marriage insurance, an old Yiddish joke I think. One wonders why some ask for the authenticity cert with that 1.5ct diamond ring, well now you know.
Other “must sell” situations:
Death, divorce, marriage (what do you do with two condos when the rent you can get doesn’t cover the mortgage, never mind all the other costs?), a new baby on the way and the one-bed just won’t work anymore, you closed on that new move-up dream house before selling the starter townhouse.
“Joe, a 21-year industry veteran, does not foresee such a drastic decline, simply because Canadian lenders have been prudent and interest rates are not going up soon. Sellers will pull houses off the market rather than accept a price drop.””
Just one more proof of how small is the understanding that Canadians have of the situation. A punch hurts twice as much when you don’t see it coming. People really don’t have a clue…
Have you ever wondered what the “Actual Bill Of Sale Value” of real estate would be if that was the actual value number used to was the committed Promise to Pay worth of related Real Estate. The bill of sale + the actual improvements + leverage against the property.
All separate of course.
not the implied, unproven value leading that has lead to the increase value of the property assessments, and not the current limited cherry picked market sales,
but the real actual money committed.
What percentage of people have not changed the value of their property and why do they not count in the “balanced” formula’s…
what is it… some 50-60 thousand properties change hands a year…
Out of what some 500,000 thousand plus in the gvrd….
One sale in 8+ alters all the properties value????
Right….
Silver
Error… should read
Have you ever wondered what the “Actual Value” of real estate would be … if the actual assessed value used was the “Promise to Pay” worth of all the related/comparable Real Estate.
Sorry
Silver
je ne comprends pas!
a philosopher asks questions like this … and feeling philosophic – an indulgence? … maybe what silver means is suppose one applied a different valuation metric … instead of taking a few recent transactions from a very distorted period in history … what if we took the actual amount people paid whenever they bought, plus improvements whenever they did them, minus depreciation and inflation-adjusted – wouldn’t that be more robust? … if you could actually manage that calculation, probably and maybe it would be another way to tell everyone paying current prices, they’re crazy … but then, doesn’t that fail to discount how the neighborhood, or city, or country, or world may have changed? … how to model that? … i used to ask people questions like ‘what does it really cost?’ when i first wandered into the domain of finance … now i know better
–
a little thought experiment? … say take this brand new 1oz silver round on my desk … what is this disk of metal really worth? … paid about $8 a while back when that got a fast food lunch … now, i could find someone to give me $30 for it and get a nice meal … or, i could put it away, forget about it for a few more years and maybe get 2 or 3 such meals … aside: try doing that with $30 … what if i’m abandoned somewhere hostile and uninhabited? … then it might be worthless … what if a plane all of a sudden appears in the sky? … now, that bright shine might be worth everything …
–
excuse the loopy example (cabernet overload) … this philosopher’s point being value derives from context, price is not value, price/value disconnects are opportunity – and that makes the world go round
i have no problem reading nemesis
at least i know he doesn’t believe in the lizard people
You guyz are s**tting me, right?…. Right?…. you mean… this wasn’t actually a documentary?…
understood … stop with the depressants, back to the hallucinogens
If one would calculate all the costs relating to owning RE,
one would realize what a crappy investment RE really is.
heresy! back to the basement with you!
you could take the most convincing, easy to follow cost breakdown showing that RE is a terrible investment and put it in front of your average house horny joe/jayne and I guarantee that they would look at it and almost immediately say “yeah, but you gotta live somewhere…”
tsk, tsk , tsk…
“..and everyone wants to live here!”
Pingback: Real Estate: “Buyers” versus “Sellers” Market predictions |