“I left Vancouver in 2005. When I go back to visit, the conversation usually turns to RE with snooty relatives boasting about their $1M houses.”

“I left Vancouver in 2005. Sure glad I did. When I go back to visit family, the conversation usually turns to RE with snooty relatives boasting about their one million dollar houses. I can’t wait for the housing bubble to pop and humble these folks. It will be a tough fall to reality for Vancouver.”
- Uh Oh Canada at greaterfool.ca 6 Jan 2012 10:37pm

17 Responses to “I left Vancouver in 2005. When I go back to visit, the conversation usually turns to RE with snooty relatives boasting about their $1M houses.”

  1. “I can’t wait for the housing bubble to pop and humble these folks.”

    Here freakin here.

  2. Well until they sell and pocket that $1M. Then even if housing busts, it wouldn’t affect that much and they still got more $$$ from the house than they could probably earn from job!

  3. Ninetonite writes:

    “Renting is always more expensive than a mortgage payment to buy the same dwelling. It’s simple economics.”

    Just lifted the above quote from this Globe and Mail story:

    I find it absolutely astounding that people are still repeating this silly dogma. It’s like realtors have done a giant jedi mind trick on the masses, and now millions walk around uttering real estate truisms to each other as though under some sort of hypnosis.

    • OK, apparently I linked straight to the comments and not the story. At least I didn’t blow the embedded link this time. I usually do. :)

    • Renters Revenge

      I did the math, my landlord subsidizes my housing by just over $1000/month. That is calculated assuming constant resale value and the figure is actually much higher if you allow for price depreciation.

    • Did my math about two months ago. I calculated an additional $900 per month if I bought the place I’m renting. Mortgage rates have fallen since then, so it may be about $700 or $800. But that’s just monthly costs. I did not include the down payment, nor closing fess, nor the lost investment income (opportunity costs) on that money.

      Apparently, I shouldn’t count those costs, since they are more than made up for with “the intangibles of owning.” So I’ve been told. I’m starting to question if anyone actually owns a calculator these days.

      Kids, if you don’t own a calculator, use Excel. Can’t use Excel? Use the calculator app on your iPhone. Still can’t add or subtract? Then buy a house.

  4. I bought a house in east Vancouver (20% down payment) in 2001. Since then the value of this house has more than doubled. Even if the end of the world (bubble pops) happens, do you really think house values will decrease more than 100%?? Even if this happened, I would still have more than 20% equity in this house. I hear house prices in Edmonton are affordable, so go move there..

    • Mike -> Please share your math again, so we know what you mean.
      When you say “100%”, do you mean “50%”?
      .
      I don’t think anybody here expects house values to drop below zero.

    • Most (all?) people on this blog would tell you that those who bought in 2001 and did not turn their home into an ATM will be safe once the prices crash.

      • What would you categorize as a crash? 20-30%, 30-50%?? Also, what do you base the inevitable crash on? I’d like to hear more specific arguments for ‘major correction’ scenario.

      • Read the bear blogs and you will find the arguments.

  5. Yes. 50% of its current value. I meant lose 100% of the price appreciation. Hope this clears things up..

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s