“I declined a promotion involving a move to Calgary because it would mean giving up our 1 car lifestyle and fantastic rental condo on the seawall.”

alter at VREAA 22 Jun 2011 5:57pm“I live in Vancouver and work for a multi-national with an office in Calgary as well. I declined a promotion involving a move to Calgary because it would mean giving up our 1 car lifestyle and fantastic rental condo on the seawall, trading in a temperate climate (albeit rainy) for cold snowy winters, and longer commutes to the outdoor activities we enjoy outside of the city. I’m a regular reader of this blog and do believe housing prices are ridiculous here and wouldn’t buy even if I had the means. But despite having lots of options to move, for some reason we haven’t yet. Also had an opportunity come up in Toronto which I didn’t take either. And I have previously lived in both those cities so have a pretty good idea of what they would have to offer.”

13 Responses to “I declined a promotion involving a move to Calgary because it would mean giving up our 1 car lifestyle and fantastic rental condo on the seawall.”

  1. That makes sense — why leave your job and your lifestyle if you’re happy? A 1 car lifestyle means this family can sock that money away for retirement.

    And housing in Calgary has its own problems due to the bubble.

  2. Depends on where in Calgary you are talking about in terms of a bubble. many inner city areas are doing well as people want a shorter commute, closer to downtown, easier lifestyle etc. In the burbs’ there seems to be many listings as well as people that may have over extended themselves. For ourselves the problem is more about jobs if we moved back. What if one of us got a job in Surrey and the other got one downtown, then you have to compromise location. My wife does not want to commute more than 20 minutes each way. We feel that we are best to stay for now, save money and move out there later to enjoy retirement.

  3. I lived on prairie for the first 38 years of my life. There is no way I’d ever go back to those cold winters, cheaper real estate included.

    • A) Calgary really isn’t “the prairies,” but I digress.

      B) Sunny and cold vs. rainy and still pretty cold. I’ll take the sun, thanks.

  4. Not sure if this insight plays into it, but I’ll give it a try in the hopes that others will challenge or de-bunk my analysis. People will be OK with less in the future. They will not demand “more home” they will be happy with what they have, and will choose a better lifestyle over a bigger house. We have done this. Able to afford twice the house, we live in a modest sized place in Amsterdam, but love the lifestyle so much, we simply don’t care. We don’t need 2 cars, or a 2 car garage, we use the equivilant of Zipcars. We don’t have a “media room in the basement” and think it is totally useless and frivolous. I am certain that more people are doing this. Consumption in the 21st Century will be more about experiences, and “using” products rather than owning them. Air BnB, house swaps, yes, these things point to what I’ve termed “enlightened consumption.” How does this apply to Vancouver? two ways: 1) People will stop caring so much about owning a house as the economics simply don’t add up. 2) People will still choose Vancouver, like the guy above, and rent or own a more modest place, with the idea that Vancouver is still a desirable place to live.

    • I think that all of the things you mention will become more common, but the question is how widespread they will be.

      In my field, I interact with urban planners a lot. I hear a lot of statements like “in the future, people will want to live in small condos near the rail line.” Okay fine, maybe more people will want that.

      But what you’re really talking about in most New World cities is increasing the number of housholds who live this way from maybe 0% or 2% of the population to maybe 6%. By one metric, that’s tripling this lifestyle, which is great. By another metric, this is still a very small share of all households.

      When we were all younger, I saw many of my contemporaries in the urban planning related fields argue that we’ll all be shrinking our footprint and increasing housing density. Then they had kids and bought homes on standard lots. If urban planners themselves make this decision, what is the odds that the rest of the population will?

      Anyway, Amsterdam and many Old World cities are very different from our relatively new cities. Which is how many planners over here get into trouble, trying to recreate a European model that never applied here.

      • We do see the densification model in the downtown core of Vancouver, and though it is not nearly as charming as “old Europe” it is happening and seems to be working. You are correct about family size and space. In Amsterdam half the crowd leaves for the boring ‘burbs so their kids can run around in the backyard. The other half stays and the kids find parks, and pedestrianized streets. I suppose the other big trend is simply less kids/ no kids, and the decline of marriage/monogamy- which will have an impact on housing preferences. Also, if Vancouver is becoming an Asian city, will the same western consumption desires exist? Will the younger gen (Asian or not) prefer to live in Surrey in a big ugly house, or in a small modern glass cube “loft” downtown, close to Michelin starred Asian fusion restos, multiplexes, Lady Gaga nightclubs, and small funky boutiques? I see the duality- the desire for “more stuff” on the one hand- a relic of 20th Century Canadian Tire consumerism= big house, suburb vs. a desire for more experience, but less footprint- modern glass cubes and loftspaces close to densification of “culture.” If you want “authentic” move to Detroit or the South Side of Chicago for affordable space and participate in the rejuvenation of urban ruins.

    • Like living the single life in Tokyo where you can afford to own clothing and a few electronic devices. No car, no house, no condo, no significant possessions but you go out for dinner and drinks every night. Also, no debt and no worries!

      It’s a different matter when you have a family however. In many cases, buying a house 2 – 3 hours away by train from your Tokyo office provides a better home-life for your family but you eventually die before retirement age with the stress of long hours working and commuting and rarely seeing your kids. This explains why many families leave Tokyo to move to smaller cities like Sapporo or Fukushima – they are simply more affordable to raise a family and afford a better quality of life if you have to work for a living.

      Generally big cities all over the world can be great places to raise a family if you have lot of money. Vancouver is no different – it just happens to be one of the most expensive cities in the world (in terms of price to income) particularly if you want to live in a single family dwelling. You can cut your consumption of non-necessities to zero but the average person who must work to support his family will not be able to provide as much (in terms of quality and quantity) for his family living in Vancouver compared to most other Canadian cities. If this is the case, who cares whether there’s no snow in Vancouver or Vancouver has flowers in March. There’s just more important things when you have a family.

      This helps explain why Vancouver has so many D.I.N.K couples based on my experience. In most cases, Vancouver couples either choose to have no kids or they leave to raise a family. It comes down to the cost of your desired quality of life and whether you have the budget.

      • Agreed. While we are quite happy with our lifestyle now, we are hoping to start a family in the next couple of years and will have some tough decisions to make given the lack of affordable family friendly housing downtown and surrounds.

  5. Danielle Nicholson

    We live in New Westminster, and can walk to the Skytrain. We’re also only about 5 minutes from Hwy 1, so we can get almost anywhere. We too are a 1 car family, and love where we live. We think housing prices are insane, but have found a great deal on renting a house in a great neighborhood with nice neighbors.

    Would we leave Vancouver? If the right opportunity came up, maybe. But we would much rather stay.

    • another thing i find funny is people who live in suburbs with terrible traffic to even get into vancouver (love driving kingsway from new west to van…yeesh) still refer to where they live as ‘vancouver.’

      gvrd..gvrd

  6. We live in Vancouver because of our extended family and decades long friendships. We rent a SFH and the cost is fine, and we have space.

    Must say, though, that we’d still be living closer to downtown if it hadn’t been that “ecodensity” seems to mean up to 850 square feet and no closet space. I’m sick of granite & stainless, more bathrooms than bedrooms, and tiny closets. Ridiculous.

  7. The trends for the homes in the burbs also seem to be to have these massive master bedrooms with ensuites and walk in closets the size of some yaletown condos, while the bedrooms are barely large enough for a bed. We preferred an older neighborhood, where the homes were better built and the bedrooms for the kids are a better size than new homes.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s