“So let me get this straight: If you ignore all of the expensive houses, then all of the rest of the houses are inexpensive? Brilliant!”

Extracts from ‘Busting the myths of Vancouver real estate’, by Frances Bula, G&M 25 May 2011 -
Mr. Bob Rennie [local Vancouver condo marketer], who commissions research on real-estate trends for an annual talk to the industry, said that once the skewed prices paid by a small group of mostly mainland Chinese buyers in Richmond and the west side of Vancouver are removed, housing prices are comparatively reasonable.
“When you’re looking at the numbers, you have to build a fence around the west side, where there are external forces operating that have nothing to do with local forces,” Mr. Rennie said.
Yes, he said, the sale prices on those houses have increased dramatically in the past year.
But that top one-fifth of the market operates in its own world and has almost nothing to do with what is happening with real estate in the rest of the region that is connected to the local-buyer market, he said.
Some expressed disbelief in Mr. Rennie’s assessment when it was delivered last week.

Mr. Rennie noted the average condo in Metro Vancouver sold for a mere $313,000 last year after the most expensive condos in the top fifth of the market were taken out.
Similarly, single-family homes in the top fifth of the market average $1.72-million. But once those high-end sales are removed from the price-averaging mathematics, home buyers in the rest of the region paid an average of $632,000.

From the comments section of the same article:
‘What did I say’ 25 May 2011 at 2:53am -
“So let me get this straight: If you ignore all of the expensive houses, then all of the rest of the houses are inexpensive? Brilliant!”

Well said.
Remarkable that the Globe runs an article like this without any critical analysis.
- vreaa

8 Responses to “So let me get this straight: If you ignore all of the expensive houses, then all of the rest of the houses are inexpensive? Brilliant!”

  1. Frances Bula ran that article. It would seem prudent to get comments from a few other sources on Rennie’s hyperbolic claims.

  2. 632K is not considered to be expensive? eeeep!

    you can get a really nice house with views in Seattle for that.

    • Absofrikkin’lutely. Plus, in most non-bubble places, you can get on the property ladder at the lowest rung with a household income of less than $80,000.


  3. “THAT’s not expensive, THIS is expensive..”

    $5.2M, No views:
    http://wp.me/pcq1o-2mn

    (you yanks are wussies!)

  4. Oh yeah, and inflation is only 3.3% if we ignore all these things like food and gas.

  5. I wonder where this Mr. Bob Rennie lives. He sounds clueless.

  6. Using the MLS website as a quick way to sort through what was available in the Vancouver market I came up with this quick and nasty distribution of prices. This isn’t supposed to be accurate, but hey I’m not a realtor either so…

    Total units=2741 as of May 26, 2011 @3:30
    000k-300k = 335 units
    300K-350k= 260 units
    350K-400K= 329 units
    400k-450k= 267 units
    450k-500k= 227 units
    500k-600k=375 units
    600k-750k= 279 units
    750k-1,000,000= 280 units
    >1,000,000 = 389 units

    Taking the top 20% off the market ( not sure if we call this a Rennie or not) would be removing 548 units from this pile. Taking the same from the bottom would seem to be only fair right? Were talking about the middle class lifestyle here- the dumps have got to go.

    The unit according to my quick eyeballing as the 548th cheapest place is
    , MLS v843429 , ringing in a 349K: More expensive than Bob’s “New average” 313k price. Of course, my research is loose, riddled with holes, and the search area includes whatever the MLS.ca site thinks Vancouver is.
    As well as not being a relator I’m not a statistician. But it doesn’t look to me like I could get an average of 313k from the data that I’m looking at.

    Maybe if I go back to the MLS and look for a 313k “new average” apartment it will become more clear for me. What happens to show up for $312,900?

    A Rennie Marketing Systems property MLS: V886805

    • LOL! that Rennie condo for sale is a 467 sq.ft 1-bed condo. I can’t imagine how cramped that place will be– in my last condo, the bachelor suites were 400 sq.ft! 1-beds were more like 600 sq.ft! Good luck with the eventual buyer living an “average” lifestyle in that shoebox!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s