“Having your entire financial worth wrapped up in a house and living on its nominal value is a risky situation. But in a way, [this] is only following cultural norms. Homes today fulfill much more than a need for shelter. They are physical representations of our tastes and the lives we lead — or wish we led. Last year, Los Angeles Times columnist Meghan Daum chronicled a lifetime of housing lust in a memoir whose title sums up a common attitude: ‘Life Would Be Perfect if I Lived in That House’. “Few things in this world are capable of eliciting such urgent, even painful yearning,” she writes. – from ‘Housing: Real insanity’, Canadian Business magazine, April 25, 2011
“We are being persuaded to spend money we don’t have, on things we don’t need, to create impressions that won’t last, on people we don’t care about.” —Tim Jackson, economist, from talk at TED.com


































it’s fairly obvious who profits from the consumerism-model of economics,
and there’s two rather large players stepping into that model right now – i don’t think the ecosystem will survive that – we’ve done enough damage.
unfortunately, talking about it rationally with them doesn’t seem to work, they just say we’re trying to hold them down.
okee doke!
Wait, the “borrow to get ahead” was a real ad? Seriously?
SRSLY! (so was this)
Wow. That ad is….. bizarre. So truth in advertising? That buying a home is a “risk”?
No wonder AIG went down the tubes.
Yes, “Borrow To Get Ahead” is a real, current ad and page at Scotiabank’s website:
http://www.letthesavingbegin.com/borrowing#borrow-to-get-ahead
Let the saving begin! By borrowing first.
Makes sense